Bureaucratic Reform and Political Elite Behavior Change: The Impact of Merit System on Political Patronage in Regional Government

Authors

  • Abd Haris Universitas Muhammadiyah Sinjai
  • Hermansyah Hermansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sinjai
  • Kiki Rasmala Sani Universitas Muhammadiyah Sinjai
  • Suardi Mukhlis Universitas Muhammadiyah Sinjai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/icsshi.v2i1.65

Keywords:

Bureaucratic Reform, Decentralization, Elite Behavior, Merit System, Political Patronage, Regional Government

Abstract

This study examines the impact of bureaucratic reform through merit system implementation on political elite behavior and patronage politics practices in regional government. Using a mixed-method approach combining quantitative analysis of 150 regional governments and qualitative case studies in five provinces during 2019-2024, this research investigates how civil service recruitment reforms influence transactional political practices. The study employs New Public Management theory, political patronage theory, and institutional change theory to analyze the transformation of elite behavior. Results indicate that merit system implementation significantly reduces political patronage practices (β = -0.627, p < 0.001), with stronger effects in regions with higher institutional capacity and civil society oversight. However, political elites adapt by shifting patronage mechanisms from recruitment to procurement and project allocation. The study reveals that successful bureaucratic reform requires simultaneous strengthening of transparency mechanisms, political accountability, and civil society participation. These findings contribute to understanding the complex relationship between administrative reform and political behavior change in decentralized governance systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Buehler, M. (2023). Elite competition and institutional change in contemporary Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 23(2), 289-312.

Bussell, J. (2023). Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. Oxford University Press.

Dahlström, C., Teorell, J., Wahman, M., & Fazekas, M. (2023). A global dataset on election integrity and democratic accountability. Political Research Quarterly, 76(1), 234-251.

Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (2022). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of "Weberian" state structures on economic growth. Governance, 35(2), 445-467.

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2023). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso Books.

Grindle, M. S. (2022). Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance. Princeton University Press.

Hicken, A. (2023). Clientelism and democratic representation in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 187-208.

Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2022). Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield.

Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2023). A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford University Press.

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.). (2021). Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge University Press.

Kopecký, P., Scherlis, G., & Spirova, M. (2022). Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions. European Journal of Political Research, 61(2), 443-475.

Mietzner, M. (2020). Populist anti-establishment rhetoric in Indonesia: Jokowi's presidency and the transformation of political discourse. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(5), 808-829.

North, D. C. (2021). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.

Nurmandi, A., Almarez, D., Jovita, H. D., & Mutiarin, D. (2020). To what extent is social media used in city government policy making? Case studies in three ASEAN cities. Public Policy and Administration, 19(3), 435-459.

Peters, B. G. (2021). The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration (7th ed.). Routledge.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2022). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - Into the Age of Austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Prasojo, E. (2022). Bureaucratic reform in Indonesia: Current progress and future challenges. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 78-97.

Pratikno. (2021). Decentralization and regional autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation challenges and democratic implications. Indonesian Political Science Review, 6(2), 145-167.

Smoke, P. (2023). Rethinking Decentralization: Assessing Challenges to a Popular Public Sector Reform. World Bank Publications.

Svara, J. H. (2021). The Ethics Primer for Public Administrators in Government and Nonprofit Organizations (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Szwarcberg, M. (2022). Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Abd Haris, Hermansyah Hermansyah, Kiki Rasmala Sani, & Suardi Mukhlis. (2025). Bureaucratic Reform and Political Elite Behavior Change: The Impact of Merit System on Political Patronage in Regional Government. Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Innovation, 2(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.70062/icsshi.v2i1.65